Testing Neat Video plug-in in FCP X

suggest a way to improve Neat Video
valleo
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:23 pm

Post by valleo »

It's 10 minutes long, up to 10 tracks in vertical.
Lot's of cuts and transitions.
I have a ATI 4870 in my 8 core Mac Pro 2009 and 24GB Ram.
GPU isn't recognized by Neat Video.
But my best cpu combination is 15 (out of 16)...[/img]
NVTeam
Posts: 2748
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:12 pm
Contact:

Post by NVTeam »

Since it is ATI, it is used by FCPX itself, but not by NV (NV doesn't use ATI cards in this version). Something else is taxing the GPU then, FCPX or perhaps the output codec.

What happens if you discard the background-rendered data in timeline before exporting (to force FCPX and NV to actually re-render the clip during export)? Does that produce more CPU load when export goes over the clip with NV? Does it render (export) faster or even slower?

Vlad
valleo
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:23 pm

Post by valleo »

That's hard to say whether its faster or slower because I have to rerender the whole project and there are several effects, corrections and filters around that Neat clips. So there is no way to say it clearly.
NVTeam
Posts: 2748
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:12 pm
Contact:

Post by NVTeam »

If you discard the rendered data for that one clip then it will not be necessary to re-render everything. To discard for one clip you can simply adjust the filter settings in that clip.

Vlad
valleo
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:23 pm

Post by valleo »

I trashed all render files of this project and switched my codec from ProRes422 HQ to ProRes Standard because of archiving. I rerendered it with the command "render all". Now the export works correctly!
chrism00
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:51 pm

update

Post by chrism00 »

So how close is this FCP X version to becoming approved for full use?
NVTeam
Posts: 2748
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:12 pm
Contact:

Post by NVTeam »

As soon as we resolve most serious issues. We are working on that, there will be an update here.

Vlad
chrism00
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:51 pm

Post by chrism00 »

ok, kind of the last piece of the puzzle for a lot of people. There is no other Denoise filter out for FCP X, so will be nice to have it soon! Thanks!
superEk4
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:25 pm

Post by superEk4 »

sorry for the silly question, i have downloaded the demo for fcpx but i can't find it my fcpx version 10.0.3. where can i find the neat video function?
NVTeam
Posts: 2748
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:12 pm
Contact:

Post by NVTeam »

Have you downloaded v3.1 available in Download page (v3.1 doesn't yet include support for FCPX) or v3.1.1 that is available from support [at] neatvideo.com on request?

Vlad
superEk4
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:25 pm

Post by superEk4 »

downloaded n its working but the rendering very slowly esp the burning to mov.

btw its home edition so its 1280x720? my video is 1980x1080 so how?
NVTeam
Posts: 2748
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:12 pm
Contact:

Post by NVTeam »

Quality noise reduction is no fast process, it requires time.

You will need the Pro edition to render 1920x1080. You can upgrade to Pro edition.

Thank you,
Vlad
valleo
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:23 pm

Post by valleo »

Since 10.0.4 update the image is flipped in the options window of Neat Video.
NVTeam
Posts: 2748
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:12 pm
Contact:

Post by NVTeam »

Yes, some things are fixed in 10.0.4, some are broken again. :-/
We are testing that now too.

Vlad
valleo
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:23 pm

Post by valleo »

Can you please tell me what's fixed.
Because Larry Jordan mentioned something about a huge bug which might be fixed in this version.

Thank you
Post Reply