Problem with Batch profiling
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:33 pm
Hello,
i wanted to make profiles in a batch, it works BUT not i need an option to make profiles only if the quality is for example at least 90%.
(otherwise don't make a profile)
Because i figured out in neat every percent counts for quality.
The second problem is there is no way to manage in or outside neat the Profiles with priority of ProfileQuality like i need it.
For example an FileEditor in Neat to view the Profiles in a list which they can be sortet by Camera,ISO,Quality,Shutterspeed and so on.
OR
the easier way is that neat shoud writea tag with in the Filename for Profilequaliy like this:
FinePix S602 ZOOM (Q90) (ISO200; 3bpp; SharpNormal; 2832x2128; WB code(12); 1by210s).dnp
where (Q90) stands for profilequality of 90 percent.
(This should be the first tag, because only this way it could be sortet in the windows explorer be name/quality)
the normal file i get is only:
FinePix S602 ZOOM (ISO200; 3bpp; SharpNormal; 2832x2128; WB code(12); 1by210s).dnp
I don't know if this 2 things are easy to solve or my questions are better in the feature-request part of this forum.
greets
i wanted to make profiles in a batch, it works BUT not i need an option to make profiles only if the quality is for example at least 90%.
(otherwise don't make a profile)
Because i figured out in neat every percent counts for quality.
The second problem is there is no way to manage in or outside neat the Profiles with priority of ProfileQuality like i need it.
For example an FileEditor in Neat to view the Profiles in a list which they can be sortet by Camera,ISO,Quality,Shutterspeed and so on.
OR
the easier way is that neat shoud writea tag with in the Filename for Profilequaliy like this:
FinePix S602 ZOOM (Q90) (ISO200; 3bpp; SharpNormal; 2832x2128; WB code(12); 1by210s).dnp
where (Q90) stands for profilequality of 90 percent.
(This should be the first tag, because only this way it could be sortet in the windows explorer be name/quality)
the normal file i get is only:
FinePix S602 ZOOM (ISO200; 3bpp; SharpNormal; 2832x2128; WB code(12); 1by210s).dnp
I don't know if this 2 things are easy to solve or my questions are better in the feature-request part of this forum.
greets